Re: advice on package containing both .pm & .pl
Dominique Dumont <email@example.com> writes:
> Penny Leach <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> 1. seems like overkill but technically more correct and in line with policy?
>> 2. seems much less complicated but potentially not correct?
> There's a precedent: libimage-exiftool-perl is in the same case and is
> packaged along solution 1
Arg. No. That's solution 2.
libimage-exiftool-perl delivers /usr/bin/exiftool and a lot of
Image::ExifTool modules in /usr/share/perl5/
Sorry for the noise
"Delivering successful solutions requires giving people what they
need, not what they want." Kurt Bittner