Re: RFC: Pending changes in dh-make-perl
Damyan Ivanov dijo [Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:21:38PM +0200]:
> > > IIRC, there were no objections for setting DH compat level to 6 for
> > > *new* packages. I have no strong feelings, though.
> > Oh, but there were. The same backporting argument applies to new packages
> > as well as to existing ones, after all.
> Right. Even if I find it strange to backport new packages, I have no
> problems with it.
> How about this:
> * make dh-make-perl use DH 5 in generated files
> * lenny releases with debhelper 6
> * make dh-make-perl use DH6 in generated files
> Any objections for this?
Sounds sensible. Of course, "backporting" will still mean "backporting
to Etch" or "to Sarge" or even more in specific cases. But our base
should be current-stable, /methinks.
Gunnar Wolf - firstname.lastname@example.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF