Re: libfile-spec-perl vs libpathtools-perl
>>>>> "Damyan" == Damyan Ivanov <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Damyan> A dummy package will provide safe upgrade path for users
Damyan> if libpathtools-perl that don't happen to be users of one
Damyan> of the packages that depend on it.
Ahh, good point. OK, I will make one. Should I make it from the libfile-spec-perl
source package (like libproc-process-perl), or should there be a dummy
Damyan> I think it should both conflict and replace
Damyan> libpathtools-perl (<< the first of the dummy package)
Damyan> in case of the missing packaging
Damyan> licensing/copyright we assume that debian/changelog can be
Damyan> used as a source to extract years/holders of copyright. as
Damyan> for the licensing, we assume it is something that is
Damyan> "compatible with upstream license"
OK, sorry I missed your reply. IRC newb strikes again :-)