gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:59:35 +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > Let's put it the other way: Are there any strong objections to > > > switching to these scheme? If not I will do the mass-change in a > > > few days. > > > > If this is our new policy for watch files, I recommend you document > > it in policy.pod before you run the mass-change. > > I'm not really sure if this is really a matter of policy, but if > others find it useful I'm happy to write a short paragraph mentioning > that and why a watchfile is useful and writing down the proposed > pattern. Well, not that I think this actually needs to be policy, but if we go out of our way to adjust all our packages to match a single scheme, then how can it not be considered policy? Julian.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.