Re: DM and pkg-perl (alternative proposal)
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Niko Tyni, Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0200 |=-
> > I'm also unsure if it's really necessary to remove the note.
> Yes, but imagine the case when the package is already DM-enabled.
> I think a "per-group" DM list is not necessary because:
> 1) I am lazy maintaining that :)
> 2) Keeping things per-package fits with the general DM concept, IMO. It
> is all about "a package" and "a DM", i.e. it is managed on a
> case-by-case basis. (And it seems we can keep the overhead low)
OK, count me convinced on both cases. Thanks for your patience.
What's the way forward? Update the pkg-perl policy on the Uploaders
thing and add a new 'DM practices' section?
Niko Tyni firstname.lastname@example.org