Re: libpar-packer-perl and /usr/bin/par
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd be inclined to call it par-archive, rather than par.pl, but it
> probably doesn't matter a lot. The problem with par.pl is that the ".pl"
> really adds no information about what this par is, and par is pretty
> widely known as a formatting program. My first assumption would have been
> that it was a reimplementation of par in Perl. par-archive makes it clear
> that it's really about managing a particular archive format.
I agree on this, and par-archive sounds good. I'll rename the script
one more time unless somebody objects. Please Cc #451600 if you do.
Niko Tyni firstname.lastname@example.org