-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- -=| David Paleino, 13.09.2007 22:11 |=-
> Il giorno Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:36:47 +0300
> Damyan Ivanov <firstname.lastname@example.org> ha scritto:
>>> A thing I'd like to ask: I've always used:
>>> perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor VENDORARCHEXP=/usr/share/perl5
>>> to avoid the creation of an empty /usr/lib/perl5, but here  I saw that
>>> only INSTALLDIRS is set, while the directory is removed at the install
>>> target with an rmdir. Which one is the preferable way?
>> Both work. Perhaps the first looks better as the second looks more like
>> a patchwork. If you're sure the first approach is better overall (i.e.
>> should work for all packages), feel free to fix dh-make-perl.
> I don't really know. My approach is based on the Makefile MM generates (I
> didn't know of dh-make-perl until now), I don't know whether there could be
> exceptions to this behaviour or not.
dh-make-perl uses a template (two actually) for MakeMaker-based modules
so we may introduce the change only in these. Dos not hurt to try I
guess. I just prefer that some more MM-aware (like you) does the change :)
(In case you didn't notice, dh-make-perl is in the same SVN repository)
dam JabberID: email@example.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----