Re: libxml-libxml-xpathcontext-perl_0.07-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > So the question is: must we _always_ apply the Perl policy for naming
> > packages, or can we bypass that policy when the name becomes rdeundant
> > like here?
> A while ago I suggested allowing perl module packages to be named
> other than as the policy requires, as long as they also provided the
> name required by the policy. This never happened, but I still think
> it's a good idea for cases like this one.
I've actually (effectly) done this already in the case of
libimage-base-bundle-perl. [There's no image base bundle upstream, but
there should have been.]
We were at a chinese resturant.
He was yelling at the waitress because there was a typo in his fortune
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch31.php