Re: Bug#380498: parsing of atom dates is broken
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Carlo Segre wrote:
libxml-atom-perl is uploaded and since I goofed when building it, I had
to upload a 0.22a-1 version just after it. I think the other should
wait until the buildds have completed building the first package.
Does this mean that there is a 0.22a upstream version? If not, you should
have numbered the package 0.22-2 instead.
nope, I had to rename the *.orig.tar.gz because otherwise it would have
resulted as "already uploaded" and it was very large, containing all the
debian directories and the .svn parts too. In other words, I was not
uploading a "real" upstream tarball.
The reason that this happened was that I was in the source tree and used
dpkg-buildpacakge instead of the svn-enabled version. The svn enabled one
expects an original tarball in ../tarballs and so dpkg-buildpackage did
not see an original tarball and chaos resulted. Because I was a bit
tired, I did not pay attention and mistakely uploaded this.
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College
Illinois Institute of Technology
Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494