Re: Bug#169935: NMU of libdb4.0 for prio:standard
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:34:39PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Is it time for an NMU on this bug, is
> > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=perl wrong, or is
> > there a bug with libperl5.8, perl-base, perl-modules, perl-doc, perl-suid,
> > libperl-dev, and/or libcgi-fast-perl (all aka src:perl?)?
> > I don't mean to imply a false dichotomy, but I think an NMU may be called
> > for as this bug is more than four months old and it's an RC bug.
Pending? Not a bug? A bug in something else? Other things to consider?
Thanks for your prompt reply.