Re: lintian goes wild?
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > #define __NR_olduname 109
> > #define __NR_iopl /* 110 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_vhangup 111
> > #define __NR_idle /* 112 */ Obsolete
> > #define __NR_vm86 /* 113 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_wait4 114
> > We need to fix the kernel (again)?
> Yep, looks like exactly it. Either the kernel needs fixin, or h2ph needs
> to deal with it.
Er, I see. It is a kernel problem. Ignore my previous mail.
'not supported' is not inside a comment. I bet this was done to detect code
that attempted to use those defines on arches that don't support it.