[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#400722: marked as done (openoffice.org-calc: search function won't work with '+' character)

Your message dated Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:05:42 +0100
with message-id <E1H3uC6-0000w0-AM@pepinux.red.isotrol.com>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: openoffice.org-calc
Version: 2.0.4-7
Severity: important

This example doesn't work on my debian sid system:

   A      B    C
1  AA     1   =search("AA+BB";A1:A3;B1:B3)
2  BB     2
3 AA+BB   3

Can't I use '+' character when I use search function ?

My oocalc display 1 at C1 :(

Thanks you !

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-calc depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                      1:4.1.1-20  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6                   4.1.1-20    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.6c2              4.6.2-3     STLport C++ class library
ii  libufsparse                  1.2-7       collection of libraries for comput
ii  openoffice.org-core          2.0.4-7     OpenOffice.org office suite archit

openoffice.org-calc recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Invalid bug

--- End Message ---
Reply to: