Seg, 2005-11-07 às 11:26 +0100, Rene Engelhard escreveu: > reassign 337853 openoffice.org > tag 337853 + moreinfo > severity 337853 important > thanks > > Am Sonntag, 6. November 2005 22:59 schrieb Paulo Jorge Jesus Silva: > > Package: openoffice.org-common > > Version: 2.0.0-2 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > Uh, you talk about that the binaries segfault. and the binaries are *not* in > -common... -core does contain soffice.bin. so that would be the right package > (or openoffice.org, although that's a metapackage but it's the source package > too, so..) Sorry about that, I searched the package where soffice belongs, I suppose I should had search the soffice.bin file. > > Starting any openoffice.org program fails: > > > > ~$ oowriter > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17544 Segmentation fault > > "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" ~$ ooffice > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17561 Segmentation fault > > "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" ~$ oocalc > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17574 Segmentation fault > > "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" > > Anyway, this doesn't help anybody. You would have to give more infos... > like strace and gdb backtrace from running soffice.bin... > > Anyway, it works here and on dozen other systems so it isn't RC... Yes I thought it was strange, especially because I already had openoffice.org 2.0 running without problems in another machine. In attachment goes the output of the following execution: $ strace -f /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin 2>&1 | gzip -9 - > strace.log.gz I'm trying to run the program in my latptop (I don't know if this changes anything). -- Paulo Silva <paulojjs@bragatel.pt>
Attachment:
strace.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part