Hi,
[ changing the subject... ]
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> Ah?
> And why
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2003/debian-openoffice-200307/msg00171.html, then?
Because of exactly the reason I wrote already. :P
Chris writes in that message:
> --- officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu 8 Apr
> 2003 15:55:00 -0000 1.10
> +++ officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu 20 May
> 2003 10:54:34 -0000
>
> to this:
>
>--- openoffice/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu
>8 Apr 2003 15:55:00 -0000 1.10
>+++ openoffice/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu
>20 May 2003 10:54:34 -0000
If you would do the "first variant patch", it would strip of officecfg and
does not find the file. On the second one openoffice is stripped,
officecfg/* remains and can be found for patching
debisn/scripts/patch.apply contains:
| if $cmd $parms $f | (cd $SOURCE_TREE; patch -p1) > $stampfile.log; then
So the patches are applied when you are alread in $SOURCE_TREE
(build_tree/oo_1.1_rc in his case) and you of course need that officecfg/ to
figure out which file to patch....
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgpQgnnDc_pOm.pgp
Description: PGP signature