Re: Freeze for LLVM packages
StÃ©phane Glondu <email@example.com> writes:
> Le 29/08/2010 23:10, Arthur Loiret a Ã©crit :
>> There you go:
> From the diff:
>> define libllvm-ocaml-dev_extra_binary
>> if test "x$*" = "xlibllvm-ocaml-dev" ; then \
>> - cp $(D)/debian/$*.META $(D)/debian/$*/$(OCAML_STDLIB_DIR)/METAS/META.llvm ; \
>> + cp $(D)/debian/$(strip $(call pkgname,$*)).META $(D)/debian/$(strip $(call pkgname,$*))/$(OCAML_STDLIB_DIR)/METAS/META.llvm-$(UVERSION) ; \
> This won't work because of "." in $(UVERSION). "." is reserved for
> delimiting subpackages. You should replace them with something else
> (e.g. "_"), or drop punctuation altogether (as in META.llvm27). And the
> contents should also reflect the (findlib) package name.
> Actually, the same applies for llvm-2.7 as well... The META files should
> be fixed for both, or dropped. They are useless as they are (it was fine
> when the package name was versionless).
> Attached is a (tentatively) fixed META.llvm-2_7 file. Beware that the
> "directory" variable refers to the actual directory (here, llvm-2.7),
> and the "requires" refer to the package name (i.e. the extension of the
> META file, here llvm-2_7 or whatever you choose).
> And by the way, "libllvm-ocaml-2.7-dev" doesn't respect OCaml packaging
> policy (which is still work in progress...) and is not handled by
> dh_ocaml (the virtual package with ABI hash is not provided)...
> something like "libllvm-2.7-ocaml-dev" would be better.
Should we have an ExtUnix.Linux submodule for eventfd and signalfd?
let eventfd () = throw ENOSYS
on platforms that don't have it?
I could imagine emulating the eventfd with pipes but signalfd might be
impossible to emulate.