Re: patches license
On 30-01-2009, Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:41:01PM +0100, Florent Monnier wrote:
>> And are patches always under GPL, or should I check for each patch ?
> You should check, as you should check with software in general.
> ACK on Julien comment: patches generally match software
> license. Please report any violation of this assumption you find in
> our packages.
I am not sure that every patches I have done are compliant with upstream
LICENSE... However, I think that "few lines" patches are mostly
irrelevent WRT license in general -- i.e. it is ok to provide a few line
patches without copyright/license.
The only thing is that it is a good practice to say where your patch
comes from, if you decide to copy them elsewhere....
Sylvain Le Gall