Re: hevea licencing problems
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:56:12AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL
> which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the
> events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I correct? Should this
> package be moved to non-free?
Frankly, I did not follow the discussion about QPL during the summer.
Is there really a *consensus* that all QPL-licenced software is not