Re: splitting ocaml-native-compilers
Sven <email@example.com> writes:
> > The period does not make a very pretty name. (I love dashes).
> > Why not also ocaml-opt-compilers or simply ocaml-opt ?
> I would prefer the dash form also, but then, is ocaml-opt informative enough ?
> opt stands for optimized and not for optional though, isn't it ?
> Still notice that the native code compilers suffer a bigger load time, at
> least it was so some time ago, so the files need to be real big for the
> advantage to be noticed, so it is not a plain 'optimization'..`
ocaml-native-compilers does please me anyway ;-)