Re: RM omins, om, vcf
On Sunday 14 October 2007 11:32:28 tim hall wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think it would be a better idea to put out an RFP on ingen
>
> Judging by the complete lack of bug reports against om, I'm guessing the
> package fails to run on anyone's system.
AFAIK it runs fine on 32bit intel machines.
> I think om should be Orphaned,
> I know that might seem slightly odd, considering that it is a
> co-maintained package already, but this action may result in the most
> appropriate outcome.
Which is ? (Which outcome?)
Joost
Reply to: