[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFH: db5.1 build fails with configure: error: The Java compiler javac failed (see config.log, check the CLASSPATH?)



On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:44:12PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I need a help with java build on mips, the db5.1 build fails with:
> 
> checking SOSUFFIX from libtool... .so
> checking MODSUFFIX from libtool... .so
> checking JMODSUFFIX from libtool... .so
> checking for javac... javac
> configure: error: The Java compiler javac failed (see config.log,
> check the CLASSPATH?)
> dh_auto_configure: ../dist/configure --build=mips-linux-gnu
> --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include
> --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info
> --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/db
> --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr
> --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-cxx --enable-compat185 --enable-sql
> --enable-stl --enable-tcl --enable-java --with-tcl=/usr/lib
> --enable-test returned exit code 1
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2
> checking if javac works... make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd2-db_5.1.25-7-mips-HWTzBc/db-5.1.25'
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> 
> It works on all other (buildd supported) platforms, so I quite don't
> have a clue what might be causing this.
> 
> You can find full build log at:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=mips&ver=5.1.25-7&stamp=1303372395
> 
> I would rather solve this than disable Java building on mips (which
> would be quickest solution).
> 

The bug seems to be a bug in the packaging of gcj-4.4, which happens
when gcc-4.4 is at version 4.4.5* and gcj-4.4 is at 4.4.6*. I have
upgraded the chroot on corelli.d.o, so that it should now work again.
Please reenable java support on mips.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: