On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15:14 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, > and apparently nobody cares. > I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move > to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect this to be > solved in a reasonable timeframe? > Is there a particular reason for not using the default (4.8) libdb version for those 2 packages? They're the only reverse-depends of db5.0 in the archive afaict. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature