Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
At Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:59:58 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:40:53AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:44:00 -0500,
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:07:18AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:33AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > > However, bits/syscall.h should be provided by glibc - it should be
> > > > > generated from arch/mips/unistd.h. In kernel 2.6 mips guys introduces
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it should. drow has fixed it in his tree, and this fix should be in
> > > > the next upload.
> > >
> > > No, I've fixed it in my (MontaVista) tree and sent the patch to
> > > debian-glibc. Someone should figure out if it works on Debian's
> > > version of glibc and kernel headers also, which is quite different from
> > > the ones we're using at MV.
> >
> > Where can I find your patch? The current syscall.h is broken, so I
> > think you're ok to put such patch into debian-glibc cvs, and we watch
> > the result of buildd if no one is trying to look it.
>
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/10962
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/debian-glibc-200401/msg00115.html
Thanks, this can be applied cleanly into the debian-glibc tree.
Unfortunatelly this patch touches configures; it should be built,
tested and confirmed.
Guido, could you build with this patch? I'm OK to prepare and put
dpatch to debian-glibc cvs for this.
> I'd be really grateful if you'd take care of that. The other thing I
> know needs to be done is to either add an environment variable to
> enable the ld.so warning, or just disable it entirely - Jeff, if you
> aren't going to have time for the former then let me know so I can do
> the latter.
Indeed. Jeff?
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: