Re: How to migrate to testing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24.01.2012 10:49, Olе Streicher wrote:
> The problem is now that the new version depends on some packages that
> are still not available everywhere (libatlas-base-dev), and it also
> fails to build on mips and mipsel (when running the unit test of the
> package). [..]
> So, what should I do now?
Yes. Testing migration rules require that the package is built on all
architectures it built in the past in order to enter Testing [1].
File a ftpmaster removal bug (ANAIS - architecture not in source) of
outdated architectures in unstable for your package. Once they did, your
package can migrate again [2].
> And how can I debug the problems
> occurring in the unit tests on mips/mipsel? The log output is not really
> helpful here (timeout termination on mips, sigbus on mips). Are there
> machines available to run some debugging?
You should try to get in touch with mips porters to get some hints.
Alternatively you can use qemu to get a MIPS architecture for debugging.
If you have some reputation within Debian any Debian Developer can
advocate you for a porterbox guest account [3].
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
[3] http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=FZc5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: