Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf
>>> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
>>> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
>> That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
>> similar experiences.
>
> It's just too common to be "the default route".
>
>> I know what you mean. I am a Debian Maintainer by myself and I'm in the
>> same situation as you are. Several Debian developers are perhaps quite
>> annoyed by me as well, as I was complaining a lot about the sponsor
>> situation in Debian in the past.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00753.html
> This one?
Hmm, it was very interesting thread [1]. Thank you for a link.
Best regards,
Boris
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/thrd2.html#00753
Reply to: