Re: RFS: python-poster (was: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer)
If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are
acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a
newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate
code. If fixing part of the Lintian warnings are not fit for a NMU,
I'll gladly not do it ;)
Just a question though:
> + * debian/watch:
> + - Add `debian uupdate` after the URL
> Heavens forbid!
Could you please elaborate? Do you mean that this is not appropriate
for a NMU, or in general?
Motivation for this change: footnote 83  of the Debian New
"If the uscan command downloads the updated source but it does not run
the uupdate command, you should correct the debian/watch file to have
debian uupdate at the end of the URL."
Thanks for looking at it, though!