[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andrew,

On 08.09.2011 22:54, Andrew O. Shadura wrote:
> We already have ITP bugs. Why not just retitle them into RFS when
> someone wants their package to be sponsored?

We discussed that in IRC a few days ago, where I was proposing that more
or less. I summarize concerns to use WNPP:

* The owner of the bug should be the person whom closes it. For WNPP
bugs that's the maintainer, whereas for RFS bugs the owner. (jwilk)

* Having sponsorship requests and tracking orphaned packages are
different areas. (ansgar/jwilk)

* WNPP bugs are about keeping track of package status. Not about
mentoring (ansgar)

That seem to be valid points, I admit. Above statements quoted without
explicit permission - I hope that's ok.

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=0gn2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: