Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
Kilian Krause wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> > Nicolas wrote:
> > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same.
> > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License
> > paragraph.
> actually you may be interested in the base-files package having
> which would make a reference to that file sufficient IMHO.
I was referring to the Apache and Expat licenses, that do not have a
stand-alone License section at all, in violation of DEP-5. You're
absolutely right about referring to the common-licenses files instead of
including the full text of the license, but a stand-alone License
paragraph is still required in that case.