Re: RFS: libiwtan
On 27/02/2011 20:12, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2011-02-23, Marco Cornolti <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Dunno actually. Mainly because dh_make made it for me, so I thought it
>> was the way things are done. Isn't it needed to keep libiwtan up to date
>> even when libiwtan0 moves to libiwtan1?
> well.. who needs a library? the apps dependencies should be enough to
> keep things updated.
That's right. So are meta-packages only needed when there is the need of
installing multiple packages?
>> Anyway, I've deleted it and renamed libiwtan0 to libiwtan.
> This is wrong.
I put everything back and re-uploaded. Hope at least the package names
are right now.