Re: RFS: fdclone (updated package)
First thanks for you review.
> Firstly, why does the package need an empty file at
This version is a fdclone customization for Debian
come since 2002 and it was made by a DD.
> Secondly, the postrm should only remove that file, not all of /etc/fdclone/.
> Thirdly, your changelog entries are not particularly useful to users,
> you might want to read devref 6.3:
I've tried to improve it. be more specific.