Dear mentors, > On Thursday 18 November 2010 Tobias Winchen wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "klatexformula". > > * Package name : klatexformula > Version : 3.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Philippe Faist <philippe.faist@bluewin.ch> > * URL : http://klatexformula.sourceforge.net/ > * License : GPL > Section : tex > > It builds these binary package: > klatexformula - GUI to easily get an image from a LaTeX formula or equation > > The upload would fix these bugs: 551335 > ... > > http://bitbucket.org/tobias.winchen/klatexformula_debian/downloads/ > > The build system has changed upstream and now Lintian gives some warnings: > > W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink > usr/lib/libklfbackend.so.3.2 usr/lib/libklfbackend.so > W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libklfapp.so.3.2 > usr/lib/libklfapp.so > W: klatexformula: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libklftools.so.3.2 > usr/lib/libklftools.so > W: klatexformula: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libklfapp3.2 > libklfbackend3.2 libklftools3.2 > > As I understand it I could solve these by creating three library packages > and accompaninging development packages. However, as klatexformula is a > small program and I doubt that there is interest in the lib and -dev > packages, can these simply be ignored (and overriden), or is it preferred > to have the "full" set of lib and dev packages? I fixed these bugs - the package builds now separate binary packages for the library and accompanying dev packages. Thanks to all for the answers. I am still looking for someone to sponsor this package. Best regards, Tobias
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.