Re: esekeyd and triggerhappy (Re: RFS: triggerhappy)
Dies schrieb Jonathan Nieder (jrnieder@gmail.com):
> This information could be useful for both package descriptions.
> (Maybe, for triggerhappy:
>
> That is, this is similar to esekeyd but it also supports
> <such and such>, allowing you to <such and such>.
>
> and for esekeyd:
>
> This package does not do <such and such>; for that, see
> triggerhappy. In the simple situations it does handle,
> esekeyd is {simpler to configure | compatible with the
> old funkey daemon | more conservative in its use of
> resources | providing a different interface that existing
> users might be used to | whatever}.
OK, I don't know esekeyd enough to include it into a direct comparison, but I
tweaked my package description to better reflect the main aspects of
triggerhappy and its features.
Reply to: