Re: RFS: aspell-id
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Yes, aspell dictionary packages should Provides: aspell-dictionary. The
> dictionary packaging otherwise looks OK with a very quick glance.
Thanks for checking.
I suppose  is where dictionary packaging is explained? Based on
aspell/NEWS.Debian.gz, it seems my (already limited) current knowledge
is somewhat out of date. Unfortunately a quick search through
dsdt-policy for "Provide" or "provide" does not seem to provide clear