Re: RFS: triggerhappy [fixed mistake in URL]
Dies schrieb Benoît Knecht (benoit.knecht@fsfe.org):
> I see you've now opened a bug for your package (#603842), but you still
> need to close it in your changelog. And it should be an ITP bug owned by
> you, not an RFP.
I opened that bug before I uploaded the package here, hoping that someone
else might pick up that torch :-)
> Besides that, I still believe it would be best to run the daemon as a
> regular system user by default, and let the user decide if root
> privileges are required (with a commented-out option in
> /etc/default/triggerhappy with some explanation about when and why it
> should be run as root, for example).
Do you think "nobody" would be sufficient, or should triggerhappy create
a dedicated user account for that?
> And this is not a big deal, but I think it's worth mentioning anyway:
> your man pages have a "OPTIONS AND ARGUMENTS" header, whereas
> man-pages(7) recommends simply using "OPTIONS"; you may want to change
> that in order to be more consistent with most man pages.
Hm, thanks for that remark, I'll look into this and change that in the next
upstream version.
Reply to: