Re: RFS: tictactoe

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: tictactoe
From: "I. De Marchi" <tangram.peces@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:20:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 30161604.post@talk.nabble.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTin0VotVDC1k=Z1NrMrhzMDJGp4-++Rqx_6=NO5R@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] AANLkTi=cGm7O77EA1xy9fN8r0MuJmTfoJ3bg79+GwVrd@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1288969760.3085.107.camel@voubian.casa> <[🔎] 20101105153545.GA13637@john.ssi.corp> <[🔎] AANLkTin0VotVDC1k=Z1NrMrhzMDJGp4-++Rqx_6=NO5R@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Paul!

Sorry, bad I'm not sure what is right!

>> Moreover, your debian/watch file (pasted below) is only a comment.
>> Uscan cannot use it to find new upstream version, so it is as "bad" as
>> a lintian override.

>That is the correct thing to do when it is not possible to
>automatically find new versions with uscan.

I have To keep the debian/watch commented or removed the debian/watch file?

Thanks!

I. De Marchi

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/RFS%3A-tictactoe-tp30141879p30161604.html
Sent from the debian-mentors mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: tictactoe
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

References:
- RFS: tictactoe
  - From: Innocent De Marchi <tangram.peces@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: tictactoe
  - From: Pietro Battiston <me@pietrobattiston.it>
- Re: RFS: tictactoe
  - From: Etienne Millon <etienne.millon@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: tictactoe
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: tictactoe
Next by Date: Re: RFS: tictactoe
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: tictactoe
Next by thread: Re: RFS: tictactoe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread