Re: RFS: morse (New upstream release)
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:41:40PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nanakos Chrysostomos
> > <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> Fixed the above twp changes and reuploaded to mentors.
> > Err.. Wait a second. When logging about dropped patches, please
> > be specific which ones are dropped. "4 previous patches" are too
> > broad.
> > And while we are at it, following changes are still missing:
> > - The "Homepage:" field addition
> > - The "Recommends: pulseaudio" field
> > These should really be the last set.
> Oh, yes. And another one: the debian/copyright file update.
> That is, changelog should be updated on every change done.
The dropped patches ARE ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE NEW UPSTREAM RELEASE. Should they
recorded to the changelog file? What if I had 10000 patches applied to a new upstream
release along with new package features? Should I log all the 10000 patches that are dropped
to the changelog file?
That not makes sense. I removed this changelog entry concerning the previous patches as you
suggested and reuploaded the package. Please consider that tha "dropped" as you say patches
are already included in the new upstream source files for ESR.