Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
> that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package" is
> pretty awkward...
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
Asheesh: Sounds like you got a feature request for Debexpo!
Currently we got a list of "unanswered" list emails at [1]; though it
has a couple of issues (not limited to it not updating regularly). It
also creates a number of false-positives (e.g. "nanoblogger-extra" was
also handled in the reply to the "nanoblogger" email, but detecting this
is non-trivial).
I can try to extend this script to be more suited for this purpose.
~Niels
[1] http://rose.makesad.us/~paulproteus/four-days/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=ItMW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: