Tony Houghton writes: > On 04/10/10 13:43, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > For anyone reading -- it's a bug where a terminal emulator isn't setting > > TERM properly. Kind of depressing, and kind of important! It's also > > basically a one line change. > > > > Also, as advice for the future, it would have been nice if you had said > > the above yourself. That way I wouldn't have had to go to the web and > > find out what the bug is about. > > Yes, sorry. I've read more of the Four Days thread now so from now on > I'll try to add more detail to my RFS messages. Perhaps the maintainer > of the mdn website could add some comments encouraging sponsees to try > to expand more on the template. > > > I have a Debian work night scheduled for tonight, but I'm swamped > > working on mentors.debian.net stuff. But this is a good thing to see > > fixed, so hopefully you'll see a sponsor in the next few days...? (If > > not, we're probably just all busy.) > > Usually George Danchev uploads roxterm, but I think he prefers to read > my RFSs here than to get private requests. Yes, here I'm, a bit late. I usually prefer the mailing list, so that single point of failures (as I'm currently buried with other work) are avoided as much as possible. So, please anyone else have a look at that. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.