[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)



Tony Houghton writes:
> On 04/10/10 13:43, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> > For anyone reading -- it's a bug where a terminal emulator isn't setting
> > TERM properly. Kind of depressing, and kind of important! It's also
> > basically a one line change.
> > 
> > Also, as advice for the future, it would have been nice if you had said
> > the above yourself. That way I wouldn't have had to go to the web and
> > find out what the bug is about.
> 
> Yes, sorry. I've read more of the Four Days thread now so from now on
> I'll try to add more detail to my RFS messages. Perhaps the maintainer
> of the mdn website could add some comments encouraging sponsees to try
> to expand more on the template.
> 
> > I have a Debian work night scheduled for tonight, but I'm swamped
> > working on mentors.debian.net stuff. But this is a good thing to see
> > fixed, so hopefully you'll see a sponsor in the next few days...? (If
> > not, we're probably just all busy.)
> 
> Usually George Danchev uploads roxterm, but I think he prefers to read
> my RFSs here than to get private requests.

Yes, here I'm, a bit late. I usually prefer the mailing list, so that single 
point of failures (as I'm currently buried with other work) are avoided as 
much as possible. So, please anyone else have a look at that.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: