Re: Multiple ITP's
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 13:32 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
> > In my attempt to update the Debian FlightGear packages I have decided it
> > would be best to spilt the FlightGear base package down in to its
> > different components to allow for easier setup.
> ITPs are meant for coordinating work on packages not in the archive,
> i.e. where there is no Maintainer (capital M) yet. If an updated
> source package adds new binaries, there is no need for an ITP.
By "splitting down the base package" I mean creating individual source
packages for the component parts that build there own binary packages,
this is because the component parts have separate version's.
Sorry I was a bit ambiguous,