Re: RFS: ceph
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
Ok, the build is fixed (man_MANS vs dist_man_MANS in the
and pbuilder is behaving fine on my other box. The updated .dsc is at
eek, have no spare time while prepping for a PyCon talk and
conference.freeculture.org this weekend. Ping me in 10 days?
I've rebuilt packages for the latest release (0.19.1). The .dsc is at
I've also futzed around with my scripts for building .debs for the
ceph.newdream.net repository (now using pbuilder, reprepro). I suspect
I'm not quite doing the right thing wrt package versions for the different
distributions (I'm appending something like ~bpo50+1 for lenny .deb,
etc.), but for now at least it works well enough for the separate
repository. And I'm not sure it's that important from the perspective of
getting the packages in sid anyway.
There is also a ceph-kclient package with the source code for the kernel
As I understand it there is some make-kpkg magic that is supposed to build
it automagically (if it's properly packaged) but I haven't found any good
documentation on how that should be done for standalone modules.
I'm behind on this, but I hope to look again deeper by Monday evening.
Reviewing now. Initial thoughts:
* Your diff.gz is empty. I guess that's better than making this a native
package, but other maintainers will prefer that the debian directory be added
during in the diff.gz. I think the ftpmasters might find your way a little
* You should remove the commented-out dh_* lines in debian/rules.
Generally a great package. Hey other mentors -- is an empty .diff.gz
something that will make the ftpmasters upset?
If not, I will upload it immediately. Sage, I hope we work together to
improve the other issues, but they're minor bugs compared to the great
work you've done so far.
Do more than anyone expects, and pretty soon everyone will expect more.