Hi Michael, thanks for informing us about your activity. Please understand that I'm not proposing genparse's removal out of any animosity towards genparse or you whatsoever but just because of it's lack of maintenance. On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:54:54PM +0100, Michael Geng wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:14:12PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > genparse has been orphaned for a very long time now (or has been orphaned by > > someone else after missing maintainer action for a long time) and I am > > evaluating whether a request for removal should be finally filed. > > > > You are receiving this mail because: > > - your name showed up somewhere in the history of the package > > - I think that you might be interested for some reason > > - or you maintain a related/similar package > > > > Are you interested in adopting this package? Do you know potential adopters? > > If so, please could you forward them this mail, Ccing the BTS and me? > > > > If there is no action from anyone, I'll request the removal of this package > > from Debian after a month. > > > > > > Thank you, > > Hauke on behalf of QA > > I am maintaining the genparse package on Sourceforge > (http://genparse.sourceforge.net/). I would be glad to support a new > maintainer for this package on Debian but I don't want to become > Debian maintainer myself. That sounds reasonable and I'm giving it another (additional) shot by CC'ing debian-mentors. Maybe some of our working and prospective maintainers is using genparse and willing to keep the package in shape. Hauke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature