[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: tgt (updated package,NMU)



Hi, Tim, 

There are only little difference between these package:

  1 My package use upstream version 0.9.11, and Ben's package use upstream 
version 0.9.10.
  2 Ben's package add some patch to elimate lintian warnings: binary-without-
manpage , executable-not-elf-or-script, possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl. 
The depending on openssl may be removed in the next upstream release. 
  3 My package don't enable FCOE feature.
  4 My package contain a init.d script based on the upstream source. 

I've mailed Kernel Team to ask whether they would like to upgrade tgt to 
upstream version, but got no response. 

Hi, Ben, 

Would you like to sponsor my package, or to upload your package  ? After all, 
tgt in unstable is too old. 

Thanks, 

Liang Guo

在 星期三 09 十二月 2009 03:36:33,Tim Retout 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:01:21AM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.9.11-0.1
> > of my package "tgt".
> 
> [Adding Ben Hutchings to CC.]
> 
> How does this differ to the upload Ben has prepared in bug #526562?
> 
> I think you should talk to him and the kernel team first - they may
> want to sponsor your work if you are interested in helping with tgt
> in the future.
> 
> Regards,
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: