Re: Requests to sponsor new library packages (was: why?)
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
> > person that was a new library without any application using it,
> > whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
> That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you propose,
> then, for a maintainer who wants to get a new package into Debian, but
> that package requires one or more separately-packaged libraries that
> *also* need to be sponsored into Debian before the “interesting” package
> can go in?
Put them all into the same (or linked) RFS.