Re: RFS: ognl
Matthew Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I don't like:
> * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called
> * "OpenSymphony"
> * or "OGNL", nor may "OpenSymphony" or "OGNL" appear in their
> * name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony
> * Group.
> since we are, arguably, distributing a derivative work and if we ever
> patch it then we certainly are.
Like it or not, but it seems to be fine from the DFSG side. If
upstream remains uncooperative the proper way to handle such trademark
hassle is to ship a rebranded version.