Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
Hello,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:29, Hai Zaar <haizaar@haizaar.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:23 PM, LI Daobing <lidaobing@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:31, Hai Zaar <haizaar@haizaar.com> wrote:
>>> Good time of a day, dear mentors!
>>> This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Hai Zaar <haizaar@haizaar.com>
>>> Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:57 PM
>>> Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".
>>>
>>> * Package name : libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>> Version : 1.0.1-1
>>> Upstream Author : Jan Wolter <jan@unixpapa.com>
>>> * URL : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_authz_unixgroup/
>>> * License : Apache
>>> Section : web
>>>
>>> It builds these binary packages:
>>> libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
>>> membership for Apache
>>>
>>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>>
>>> The upload would fix these bugs: 526790
>>>
>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>>> main contrib non-free
>>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1-1.dsc
>>>
>>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>>
>> comments:
>> 1. lintian warning:
>> W: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup source:
>> out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
>>
>> 2. no debian/watch
>>
>> 3. no Homepage field in debian/control
>>
> All fixed. Reuploaded.
comments:
you should not repack the upstream tarball if the upstream tarball is
already in .tar.gz format. rename or make a soft link is enough.
please fix this and re-upload.
--
Best Regards
LI Daobing
Reply to: