Re: apt-proxy, apt-cacher & approx
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> wrote:
> We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
> buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
> with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
> mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
> two. Did any of you try?
I have also experienced similar problems with both apt-proxy and
-cacher. I am now using approx, and I can report no errors with it at
all. It may be slightly slower, but that could be my imagination. I
would definitely recommend approx.
Cameron
Reply to: