On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:54 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:03, "Eugene > V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com> disait: > > >> You should keep the changelog with only one entry (Initial release) > >> since this is a new package for Debian. You should also file an ITP and > >> close it. > > Done. > > Your debian version should be 0.3.1.1-1 (not -3) since this is the first > one for 0.3.1.1 upstream version. Vincent - just a note, other sponsors have different preferences and it might be good to not confuse maintainers by prefixing your request with "IMHO" or "I want". http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#increment Uploads to mentors are just as relevant, IMHO, as uploads to Debian and all the sponsor needs to do (i.e. me) is add -v and -sa options as appropriate. Personally, I find it a lot easier to have -3, -4, -5 and more in the changelog at mentors - it makes it easier for me to use interdiff to check what the maintainer has actually done between uploads to mentors. Doesn't mentors disallow old versions anyway? Could 0.3.1.1-1 actually be re-uploaded? http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=nlkt The first version in Debian does not need to be -0 or -1 anyway - as long as "-v0.3.1.0 -sa" is used. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part