Re: RFS: arename
> Quoting myself:
> > I also heard doing direct patches to the upstream source is not liked
> > and one should use quilt or dpatch. I think using Git for this task is
> > enough to keep track of the changes and also way easier. Advocates of
> > Git-based packaging (for example, Joey Hess) seem to do it this way.
Ok. Good luck then.
> > 2) Why do you dh_strip?
> Useless indeed, fixed that.
> > 3) Why is your package Architecture: all instead of any?
> Because 'all' is the right one for architecture-independent packages like Perl
You are of course right. After having seen tons of packages mixing that
up I finally got confused myself.