On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:53:02 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <email@example.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote: > > So it should be devel, right? > > Right. I think the remaining "linux-patch-*" packages are in "devel" > too! This is what I thought! But when I searched in the debian archive I found: linux-patch-aufs: Section: misc linux-patch-bootsplash: Section: graphics linux-patch-debian-2.6.24: Section: devel linux-patch-debianlogo: Section: devel linux-patch-evms: Section: admin linux-patch-gcov: Section: devel linux-patch-openswan: Section: net linux-patch-skas: Section: devel That's why it was not much clear for me. > By the way, you should figure out whether your patch is compatible > with the default (patched) debian linux source or it needs the > upstream linux sources. It will need to be applied and > compiled accordingly. This patch will be compatible only with linux-source, that is the kernel with Debian patches already applied. > > Regards, > > Kapil. > -- > Again, thank you for your advices. Bye, Mattia.
Description: PGP signature