Paul, Thanks for your mail and comments, sorry for the delay in replying as I wasn't subscribed to debian-mentors (subscribed now). On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:54:50 Paul Wise wrote: > you might want to use quilt or dpatch to manage your changes to the > upstream source code. Thanks but I am comfortable doing things this way. > Don't forget to send manual pages and patches upstream. Done > you recommend/suggest prover9-doc (= ${binary:Version}), but > prover9-doc isn't part of the same source package, so > ${binary:Version} will never be correct. > same issue with ${binary:Version} I'm not sure what to do about these. I plan to keep the ladr and prover9-manual version numbers synchronised although I can foresee problems if I need to bump the debian revision number. Perhaps I should use (>= <current version of the other package at time of packaging>) and update manually? > hmm, #437944 is for prover9-doc, why the name change? -doc is the binary package name and conforms with the majority of manual packages out there [1] whereas -manual is the original tarball name to be preserved. I apparently used the wrong title for the bug; now changed. > move the homepage to a real field > http://wiki.debian.org/HomepageFieldHOWTO > > configure debian/rules target isn't used, remove it Done for both > documentation package description should describe itself rather than The package it is documenting? Done. These changes to become part of 0.0.200712-1 to be posted to the list shortly. Thanks, -- Peter [1] $ apt-cache search manual | grep -- -doc | wc -l 130 $ apt-cache search manual | grep -- -manual | wc -l 23
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature