Re: japa packaging (RFS?->#435583) - jack and alsa perceptual analyzer
On 17/09/2007, Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've found a tool called japa pretty useful for doing audio analysis. It
> was developed by Fons Adriaensen <fons@kokkinizita.net> under the GPL
> and is now available at http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/. As I
> regularly use this software on multiple systems I'd like it to see in
> the Debian Archive. To ease installation I built a private package
> available at:
> http://subdivi.de/~helmut/debian/pool/main/j/japa/japa_0.2.1-1.dsc.
> This package is probably not ready to be sponsored, so I'm asking for
> several things at once:
>
> Maybe someone has already built a package? Please upload it.
I don't think so [1] [2]
>
> Maybe someone wants to use my package and maintain japa? Do it!
>
> Otherwise I ask for reviewing the package (this can also be done by
> non-DDs). If nobody wants to maintain the package I can do it. Before
> sponsoring the changelog should be extended by "closes: #435583", but
> other things need to be fixed as well, so please tell me what. ;-)
1. RFP should be 'assigned' to you and retitled so it is an ITP
2. debian/changelog should reflect the Closes: #...
3. Fix all the lintian warnings (e.g. Upstream Author_(s)_: it is
either ONE author, or many authorS)
4. cleanup debian/rules and debian/watch: you don't need all those
commented lines, do you?
There might be more to come... it was just a quick check on the diff.gz
>
> Helmut
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435583 RFP
[2] http://www1.apt-get.org/search.php?query=japa&submit=Submit&arch%5B%5D=i386&arch%5B%5D=all
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard.
See http://www.noooxml.org/petition
Reply to: